More gruel
David Frum spies the bright spot in our Autumn of Shame

David Frum spies the bright spot in our Autumn of Shame

It has become a sickening ritual. Almost every day we are treated to another round of revelations. I wince now every time I see a famous name show up in a social media feed. For a moment, I find myself hoping they’ve merely died, so I won’t have to wade through the alternative – a detailed description of what they did, who they did it to, and the lies they told to escape a reckoning.

Disgust often obscures the important reality that this is a revolutionary moment. Our eyes are drawn to the grotesquerie of the details. We often miss the courage of the people stepping forward to reclaim their own story. We miss the wonder of living in a time when these revelations can finally be paired with an appropriate public response.

Day to day we are faced with one miserable story after another, whether along this theme of sexual abuse or in our wider world of public affairs. Ahead of us looms a inevitable crisis, the outcome of which is entirely uncertain. There are, however, hopeful signs of meaningful change. In an interview this week David Frum highlighted that optimistic view. He recorded his ideas in a series of Tweets that I thought were worth sharing. We might come through this crisis a better country and better people.

Presented below, a fine Sunday Sermon from David Frum.



  1. To further bolster my assertion that women are driving this train of revolt against sexual harassment vs any increase in moral I offer this quote:

    “The strong, moral commitment to the dignity of women and children recently asserting itself in our common life has mainly come from feminism, not the “family values” movement. In this case, religious conservatives have largely been bystanders or obstacles. This indicates a group of people for whom the dignity of girls and women has become secondary to other political goals.

    We are a nation with vast resources of moral renewal. It is a shame and a scandal that so many religious conservatives have made themselves irrelevant to that task.”

    The good news is that women are standing up and speaking out in great numbers – because that is where safety resides. It’s a work in progress but It is happening in spite of any broad uptick in moral or ethical standards and women are driving it. Thank god.

  2. I was really ready to move on from this issue and then a friend sent this to me. The sheer arrogance will amaze you – as it did me. Yet, Republicans will happily submit every Democrat they can through the ethics committee, while deep down this is really how they feel. I’d love to see Frum react to this since he’s of the opinion that exposure of all the sexual perfidies indicates we are becoming a more “moral” nation. No. Again, no. Women have had it with men who believe things like REDSTATE brazenly states for the world to see.

    1. Mary, I cannot tell if the Redstate article is real, or written by a liberal troll, or maybe meant to be an Onion article.

      If it’s real, then we along with the rest of the world are up against a jaw dropping insanity.

      “Unreasonable litmus tests are being applied to candidates by some Republicans, as if marital fidelity or refraining from soliciting sex with children were reliable indicators of whether a politician can be trusted to vote in a way that gives his party political victories.”

      After reading this, it has to be a troll.

      1. I wondered that…guess my sense of humor has fallen off the grid with all the stuff that’s happening. But, even if it is satire – honestly, I believe that is what they really are thinking. How else would you explain anything that has happened since the pussy revelation?

      2. On Wikipedia, I see this.

        ” In August 2015, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump was disinvited from the annual RedState gathering following controversial statements he made about American journalist Megyn Kelly; Kelly was invited to the gathering instead.[2] RedState was then one of the main centers of conservative opposition to Trump’s campaign for the Presidency, with most of its writers and editors vocally opposing Trump.[20][21]”

        So maybe someone is trolling trump supporters.

      3. If that story is not a troll bit, and serious, my many comments about removing evil from the field just becomes a bit more sane.

        When faced with such insanity and evil, violence is a definite tool to have in the bag. There is no debate, no shame tactics, nothing left that will make an impact on people who actually have value systems like the writer of that article.

        If the people of Alabamastan actually elect the pedophile, and the right-wing in Washington welcome him into the Senate, then righteous people have to do the only sane thing left, and remove moore from office with other methods.

  3. Hi Guys
    The Dems are doing it again
    Circular Firing Squad Time
    This time it’s not antisemitism its sexism

    The GOP does it every time – shout “Squirrel” to distract everybody from their crimes
    And the Dems react exactly as they want – they set up a circular firing squad and shoot each other

    This is because left wingers always feel guilty that they have not done enough to fix something
    Bill Clinton was guilty of consensual sex
    All that crap about rape “that came out later” is simply crap – if there was anything to it the GOP would have used it – after spending millions investigating they came up with consensual sex – THAT IS ALL – if there had been a whiff of actual facts behind any rape claim they would have charged him

    Lefties feel guilty that they have not done enough so they take it out on each other

    Right wingers don’t feel guilty of anything – even when they are

  4. As we find ourselves increasingly ensconced in the social earthquake unfolding across America, it’s worth taking a step back and think about how so many Democrats suddenly seem to be re-examining Bill Clinton’s presidency and coming to the conclusion that: “whoops, we kinda dropped the ball one that one. He definitely should’ve resigned.”

    Perhaps most notably is one Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) who, in one of the true bits of political irony, now occupies Hillary Clinton’s former Senate seat:

    Yet color me a bit of a skeptic that Democrats will seize this moment to its fullest. Some in the party seems more than a bit comfortable to let it all just be water under the bridge and think that it doesn’t matter in the context of today, not when we have Trump and Roy Moore to contend with.

    Recent Democratic convert Bob Scheider (an all-around fine individual whose blog ( I highly recommend) and I had a bit of a spat on Twitter earlier today. He more or less argued that it was playing right into Trump’s hands to re-litigate Bill Clinton; that it was indulging in “idle sexual gossip” and “peering into people’s bedrooms” (yes, those really were his words) to revisit a pivotal moment in Democratic Party history that, IMO, still lives with us to this day.

    My essential point was that I wasn’t trying to invade the sanctity of a couple’s marriage or anything like that, but simply that Democrats should finally take a stand and let voters know where they are. Bill Clinton wasn’t some middle-class schmuck living down the road, he was the President of the United States, and what he did mattered.. That, if nothing else, should be *abundantly* clear today.

    If Democrats believe they were wrong to have stood by him for political expediency and that they honestly thought he should’ve resigned, then they should say so. True, to say that *now*, of all times, will ring hollow to many, but if not now, when?

    Regrettably, all of that came across to Bob as little more than my, apparently, helping Trump and even being accused of being a troll (never had that one thrown at me, tbh).

    Regardless, I’d like to ask all of you whether you agree with me or not? Should Dems simply be content to let it all just be water under the bridge or should they, like Sen. Gillibrand, try and take a stand?

    1. I wonder if someone is keeping score….you know, one column for Repubs, the other for Dems .

      I never personally excused Bill Clinton for his sexual perfidies, even though most (not all) were consensual. I do think that makes a difference although let us just agree that patterns emerge which should matter. You could throw in JFK, and so many others from both Dem ranks and Republican. One of the ironic differences between the partisan assessment is that so often, Republicans look worse because they represent themselves as such god-fearing, righteous men…

      My fear with all of the women coming forward is that quantity alone may begin to tarnish the validity of their painful experience….sort of like getting used to Trump’s lies and crudity of all sorts…it just starts to blur. There is so much that needs to happen to support women fairly, certainly domestic and work abuse, but also equal rights for equal pay, paid maternity leave, egalitarian relationships rooted in shared respect and responsibility, shaming, sexualizing vs recognizing women are smart and capable…For me, respect for women is about so much more than sexual harassment and abuse, although I clearly feel this is wrong.

      As with so many human frailties, it’s complicated. Sorry, that’s the best I can do tonight (-;

      1. Understandable, though my intent is to keep this particular episode as simple and straightforward as I can, so as to avoid those complications. I simply say that in a time where we’re having this great national debate about sexual harassment and women in the workplace, if the Democratic Party is going to stand as a bulwark against Trump and everything *he* stands for and represents, why shouldn’t voters look at Democrats and their obvious political expediency in the ’90s and say: “Why the hell should we trust you?”

        I don’t say we should re-litigate Bill Clinton, but I *do* say Democrats should plant a firm flag in the ground and say that they aren’t going to tolerate those abuses, that they’ve reflected and that they’re going to do better going forward. I see no better way to get across their seriousness in that than to say that they were wrong to support President Clinton.

      2. Ryan – they’ve all been pretty stand up about Franken…I want them to be unequivocable on this as well….being juxtaposed against the GOP in the last decade plus has Dems looking pretty good in comparison but women need to know that Dems are firmly on their side…they can see who’s not…altho amazingly, white women voted in higher percentages for T than for H.

      3. You point out exactly the problem, and that’s why I feel it should be more of an imperative. What kind of message does it send that they come out so strongly against Franken, and yet when it comes to an overwhelmingly more powerful figure like Clinton, suddenly their eyes dart away and they want to start talking about the GOP’s tax bill.

        Gillibrand was brave to say what she said, but it’s not enough for her to be the only one putting herself out there like that.

      4. That’s more or less Bob’s position, to which I once again raise the retort: How do you claim the mantle of opposition to Trump when the proverbial elephant in the room (no pun intended) has people looking at you and thinking to themselves: “Oh, so they’ll only do the right thing when the politics work for them, but they’ll scurry away when it’s tough.”

        No one wants Trump to get away with *anything*, but I just think that, looking at the situation in a broader context, Democrats are cutting themselves off at the knees if they think they can play fast and loose with this issue. Voters, and women in particular, just aren’t taking that crap anymore.

      5. I simply don’t agree that Dems have been playing “fast and loose” on this issue. I do agree it is important to say what you mean and mean what you say, but I also have watched too much exploitation of any trivial issue for political gain by Repubs to excoriate Dems here. That the GOP has and will continue to give DJT a pass for his many, many violations of unethical and immoral actions speaks volumes. I cannot and will not give Repubs a pass when they are so highly selective in their moral turpitude.

      6. While true, you’re missing the point, and, frankly, leaning a bit too much into moral relativism by seemingly justifying Democratic behavior (or lack thereof) by what Republicans do or don’t do.

        >] “ I do agree it is important to say what you mean and mean what you say, but I also have watched too much exploitation of any trivial issue for political gain by Repubs to excoriate Dems here.

        It’s not about Republicans, nor should it be. It’s about doing what’s right and proving yourself in the eyes of voters.

      7. That “doing what’s right stuff”…how’s that working out for Dems right now? Especially when the eyes of Republican voters are so compromised. We’re basically saying the same thing about taking a stand on principle, just disagree as to whether the people we are trying to reach either care or will understand.

      8. Keep in mind that those “Republican voters” were a key bloc in helping Ralph Northam to a near 10pt win over Gillespie in VA and nearly handing control of the House of Delegates back to the Democrats. That didn’t happen with just Democrats alone, and the same will hold true if Dems win back the House in ’18.

      9. EJ

        My analysis is as follows:

        Over the last ten years we have seen a rising tide in white men being angry. They’ve raged against woman, against ethnic minorities, against laws and cultural norms which protects those women and ethnic minorities, and at any of their fellow white men who oppose them. At first mainstream politics in Europe attempted to ignore them, and mainstream politics in America and Britain attempted to capture their anger. Both failed: in Europe they have attacked our political systems from without, and in America and Britain they have captured the political system from within.

        This wave may be receding or it may not, I can’t say. However, I believe that another wave is coming: the anger of white women. It has built up slowly and has been ignored by many people, but has reached heights that have begun to sweep away culturally-imposed walls of silence and overwhelm previously-unthinkable standards. It may not yet have reached its climax.

        The Democrat party has the same choice now that European parties of the Right had over the last decade: do they cooperate with the wave and risk being captured by it, or do they stand against it and be overwhelmed?

        The argument about sexual harassment is a good example of this. If one is male and one wishes to cooperate with the wave, one can say “we should investigate historic misdeeds even if it is embarrassing for our party’s leadership.” If one is male and one wishes to oppose the wave, one can say “this is irrelevant at the present time, let’s not give our enemies ammunition against us.” The former is going with the wave and risks making one redundant; the latter is going against it and risks making one irrelevant. The option to oppose the investigation of sexual harassment without becoming irrelevant does not exist.

        Myself, I choose to be part of the wave.

      10. You have a good point EJ. There may well be a “anger of white women wave” building. But I do not believe it is only white women; I believe it is women of all races and creeds. I also elect to go with the wave.

        However, there is a tendency to use incidents like the Leeann Tweeden incident with Al Franken to excuse truly outrageous deeds. Which is what the R’s have done. Franken was wrong, but he did apologize and supports an investigation. On the other hand, Moore’s probable predatory behaviour is simply inexcusable and was inexcusable even in the 18th and 19th centuries.

        As mentioned earlier, the D’s have overreacted and formed a circular firing squad. That is exactly what was desired when Leeann Tweeden went public.

    2. I read this by Douthat and then deleted the comment I was going to make.

      Most of what he writes is fair. Until he says “Yes, the Republicans were too partisan, the Starr Report was too prurient and Clinton’s haters generated various absurd conspiracy theories”. OMG, what an understatement.

      Years of investigations, including multiple investigations of the suicide of a friend.

      I could not judge him, because my hatred for his enemies was too strong.
      As I write this, I’m seething.

      But, if it will help, I now call on Bill Clinton to resign.

      1. Thank you, Mary.

        This is a perfect example of the D’s snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

        Whatever the R’s invested in getting Leeann Tweeden to come out has been repaid many times over. The R’s have a single focus – maintaining the US Senate majority. By so doing they will perhaps get their tax cut for the wealthy through and possibly get through the 2018 election with their control intact. Meanwhile, the D’s are focused on whether Bill Clinton should be condemned for his actions. Next thing we know the D’s are going to want to impeach FDR and JFK and try them in the Senate for philandering. Are we going to want to impeach LBJ for using strong language in the oval office? How are they going to remove a dead person from the Presidency? This is ex post factoism at its worst.

        Their is a big difference between Al Franken’s actions, which are wrong, but it was obviously a gag shot and was on a USO tour in contrast with what Roy Moore likely did. During the 1970’s, Roy Moore’s predatory behavior towards 14 and 16 year girls was unacceptable. That was true even in the ultra-right wing and conservative environment with which Moore is associated.

        Let us focus on electing Doug Jones and building a future Democratic Party that focusses on helping the people and providing a fair and safe environment for everyone.

      2. I don’t have time or patience for this. Focus on the “now”. Stand for what you believe and let the chips fall where they may. Democrats don’t have the luxury of wasting time and energy on this BS, we have elections to win. And, by damn, that’s where our efforts need to focus.

        Distraction is a powerful tool and in the hands of Republicans it has become an art. I do not intend to let this divert my attention from the task at hand: electing Democrats. Finding and training and supporting quality candidates. If we don’t focus on this higher purpose, good people will never want to serve. We are complicit in denigrating the importance of public service when we wallow in the GOP gutter with them.

        Move on. Organize. Focus.

      3. >] “I don’t have time or patience for this. Focus on the “now”. Stand for what you believe and let the chips fall where they may. Democrats don’t have the luxury of wasting time and energy on this BS, we have elections to win. And, by damn, that’s where our efforts need to focus.

        However well-intentioned, flirt with Republicans’ ‘win at all costs’ mentality at your peril.

    3. Bill Clinton was one of my early poltician lessons. I was aware of his affairs (which while a character fault, are mutually consensual), but not any actual harassment/rape accusations until much later. Chalk that up to the days before the Internet was a thing (I didn’t have regular access to an online computer until 2000) and not paying as much attention to politics. The affairs did trouble me, enough that I voted for Paul Tsongas in the primary. In the general election I found Ross Perot too flakey and unpredictable to trust, and I was pissed off over Iran Contra. So I voted Clinton with the hope that since he was going to be in the spotlight, and he was a pretty smart guy, he’d check his desire to chase after the ladies. Sound familiar? That was my first and very harsh lesson in the eternal truth of “no, the office will not change him.” I argued against the impeachment, not because I didn’t think he did something wrong, but rather because I didn’t think the punishment fit the crime. I was looking at shenanigans like Watergate and Inan Contra, with their abuses of the whole separation of powers, as the standard of impeachable offenses. I agreed with the MoCs who were for censure. In retrospect I can agree it would have been better if he had resigned- Al Gore would have been in a better position in 2000 if he had run as an incumbent, and I’ll fight anyone (verbally) who still wants to insist that Bush was a better choice. But I do have to think about how would I have voted had I known about the more serious accusations back then. Would I have had to hold my nose and vote for Bush the Elder?

      1. Fly, I liked and voted for Paul Tsongas too. In Clinton, I was hoping for a wonky president that didn’t run the country on the advice of an astrologer. Sexual stuff aside, we got that.

        We had to choose between a known sexual predator that understands nothing and a smart seasoned politician who has a wish for the general well being. IMO.

        Have I missed something here? Did the trump voter punish Hillary for Bill’s sins? Hadn’t thought about that. I doubt it, but maybe.

      2. Hillary has been punished by Republicans because she’s smart and accomplished. She has always been a threat from the left, therefore, they had to damage her with their base. They have spent decades doing so. Hillary stayed with Bill when many women would have left – I can’t judge that. She is not above reproach in her politics but I do believe she would have protected the institutions of America’s Democracy and run the country efficiently. I supported Hillary in the 2016 election because I felt she was the best candidate and would best protect the people’s interests. Unfortunately, we have not had the opportunity to evaluate whether this would have been true. Instead, we have a man in the office of president who has sullied the office and placed people in positions of authority in government who are either unqualified or with known records of opposing the very agencies they now head.

        It’s a matter of choice. And, sadly, we are left with DJT – a man for whom I have nothing but disgust, and his minion of agency heads that are dismantling the best elements of our institutions. It is heart-breaking and repulsive to me, at once.

      3. I fully concur with all three of you. I didn’t feel the Bill Clinton’s transgressions were “high crimes and misdemeanors”, whatever that means. But the phraseology in the Constitution indicates that they should be similar to treason, which at the time was a capital offense, perhaps murder.

        I lived through and was politically aware of all these happenings and the mores of the eras in which they took place. Sometimes, I was more politically aware and active than others, due to happenings in my personal life, but I have never completely tuned out the political environment. This particular time is unique.

  5. A very smart contributor posted this and gave me permission to share it with you. Re: Al Franken’s behavior.

    “Gleaned from the CNN interview with Jack Taper last night.

    While these don’t in any way clear Al Franken, they do put the accusation in context.

    1. Most importantly, Leann appeared several times (in the past) on the Hannity show. Keep in mind that Hannity has been in a desperate search to find evidence in support of Roy Moore.

    2. Her role in the USO tour was as a Playboy model. I know that is somewhat irrelevant. On the other hand, it might suggest some level of hypocrisy over photos.

    3. In the Jack Taper interview she claimed disgust that her accusation is being viewed through partisan lenses and surprise by the level of media interest. As she is now a broadcaster and given the timing, she is either incredibly naive or not credible.

    4. Her timing is perfect for providing cover for Roy Moore. Hannity and Trump are talking extensively about Franken.

    5. The photo, while disgusting and in poor taste may have been a set-up gag shot and was taken (I think) by the USO photographer.

    Look, I’m not saying that this story was made up. Nor, that Franken didn’t behave like a jerk. I’m just saying that she may have exaggerated it and that might be for partisan reasons.”

    1. Bingo.

      Questions I have:

      1. Who took the photo? You have potentially answered that.
      2. How many other people have had a copy of that photo, and for how long?
      3. How long has she had possession of the photo?
      4. Who gave her the photo?
      5. Why did she decide to come forward now?

      And one of the guys that Chris has on his tweet feed is now linking an article that Roger Stone was tweeting about Franken BEFORE Tweeden went public.

      Once again, the Democrats plan on taking the high road, and will lose a powerful weapon against the fascists, while they sit back and high five each other. Democrats keep bringing a knife to a gun fight.

    2. Thanks for sharing that Mary. From the very beginning my cynicism-dar has been in alarm. Yesterday, when I saw the photo, I noticed it was obviously a gag shot. There was another man sitting in a seat adjacent to her.

      In reply to Dinsdale, though I agree that this is a gun fight, the Democrats do have to take the high road on this one. Calling for the investigation is appropriate. During the investigation the real facts regarding the context and Tweeden’s background can come out. Let the MSM place this in context as appropriate. Yes the right wing media will use that as evidence that evangelicals and conservatives are prosecuted.

      The downside of this is that R’s have timed this perfectly to divert attention from Roy Moore and the wealthy tax relief bill. This Franken incident will probably be sufficient to allow the people of Alabama to rationalize electing Moore. But that was likely to happen regardless, given the electorate there. Everyday, I become more convinced that the national Republican Party wants Moore to be elected as I have discussed in several comments.

      One more thing and this may be in poor taste, but I suspect that there may be other considerations involved in Tweeden coming forward at this time. Your suspicions are probably similar to mine.

  6. So, can someone tell me, in this age of 140 character attention spans, what is more important: The onslaught of sex assault and harassment revelations, or the fact that Congress just passed a tax bill that will devastate most of the country’s population and have long-term global economic impact.

    While the media broadcasts every titillating detail of every powerful man who has abused a woman in the past 40 years, the bill slides in with about half, maybe less, the coverage.

    I know sex sells, but there are priorities.

    I swear, if I did not know better, I would have thought that the republican establishment brain-trust came with up the entire idea to have all these women come out at this time as a diversionary tactic. Oh, and Tweeden appeared on of Hannity’s shows for a couple years in 2011 and 2012.

    1. I suspected that there might be a right wing connection with the Tweeden accusation against Franken. The timing is too coincidental with McConnell reacting as quickly as he did. It is typical of the way the R’s do business. Of course the right wing media will be all over this for weeks. Fortunately, the D’s are handling it correctly.

      1. My comments are going to veer awfully close to slut-shaming now, but I think they have validity. I am going to pull chunks of her biography from wikipedia (yeah, I know, ugh):

        “In 1992, while working as a hostess at a Hooters restaurant (she was in their 1994 calendar) in Colorado Springs, Colorado, she won first place in the Venus International Model Search. This break led to national exposure, including a regular role as a fitness model on the TV show Fitness Beach. Tweeden modeled for promotional work for Hooters, Venus International, Frederick’s of Hollywood.[3]

        Tweeden was a correspondent for Fox Sports Networks’ The Best Damn Sports Show Period from 2001 to 2007. In 2008, Tweeden became the third hostess of the NBC late night television series Poker After Dark.[4] She has also appeared on the political discussion series Hannity in 2011 and 2012.”

        So in all these organization where she worked, many of them that were based solely on promoting the physical attractiveness of women, Franken was the ONLY man to sexually harass her or make any kind of sexual assault?

        Or was he the highest value target?

      2. EJ

        With respect, Dinsdale, while your research of Ms Tweeden’s career is good, your research of Hooters’ policy might be lacking.

        Hooters is notorious for the high level of sexual harassment on staff, as well as the extent to which their management is willing to pressure the staff into “just ignoring it” rather than pressing charges. It has been suggested that Hooters’ employment and management processes are intentionally designed to create a harassment-friendly environment.

        A quick Google gives the following stories, all of which stress the fact that these are not isolated cases, but a constant culture of harassment out of which only a few people have succeeded in bringing lawsuits. You may as well press charges against each raindrop in a storm.

    2. I am well aware of the situation with the tax bill. The GOP has made it crystal clear that the only thing they care about is the fat cat donors not closing their wallets. Most of them don’t have the spine to even face their constituents in person to explain themselves. There’s only one proper response to that, but we have about a year before we can do it.

  7. Good News, slightly different off topic, but ties into Mary’s comments regarding 2018 election organization.

    Burien is a small suburb of Seattle with 56,000 people and less than 42,000 registered voters. It is a lower middle class and working class community.

    Early this year the City Council adopted a Sanctuary City Ordinance. This set off a real confrontation. Outside anti-immigration money poured in with the effort to get the City Council to repeal the Ordinance. A brochure was circulated purporting to give the names and addresses of undocumented immigrants with criminal histories. This was all false.

    Finally a confrontation in this election was set up between a slate of 4 pro-immigration candidates and 4 anti-immigration candidates. Though a few ballots are still being counted, the current results are clear that the anti-immigration candidates are winning decisively. These include two hispanics, one of which was born in America to undocumented parents. This person was one of the principle organizers of the pro-immigration block and is a construction foreman. Some of the anti-immigration people are incumbents.

    As an aside, the principle organizer mentioned above was out doorbelling with his daughter and got a very rude response at one home. His daughter said “It’s OK, Dad. America is just having a midlife crisis.”

    Burien is a small City and just for its Council, but it shows what local organization by motivated voters can accomplish. I wanted to share this to partially counter all the negativity we are seeing, particularly with the Roy Moore situation.

      1. EJ

        That’s fantastic news. Thank you.

        Have the publishers of the false pamphlet been charged? That sounds like a fairly open-and-shut libel case, with additional recklessness charges available depending upon the jurisdiction.

      2. I know of no efforts at litigation. In the US, litigating an issue such as this is quite difficult. Locating the specific perpetrators is difficult. The financing is from out-of-state shadow organizations funded by even more shadowy organizations. The book Dark Money makes clear how this operates. Then there is the Right of Free Speech, which the perpetrators can hide under. The people victimized do not have the resources to litigate, they will simply go into hiding as much as possible.

      3. Mary, EJ was aware that I was reporting that the Pro-immigration slate is winning. He had asked if there was anyway of going after the perpetrators of the false pamphlet giving addresses of supposed undocumented immigrants that committed crimes. I replied that I know of no litigation. He was commenting on my reply. I do wish that organizations who perpetuate these things could be held accountable easily. But that is difficult as I replied. If people were held accountable, our elections might have many fewer lies, untruths and dirty tricks.

      1. EJ,
        I am very pleased that there are some in Europe who recognize the benefits of immigration. When Merkel opened the doors of Germany to the Syrian immigrants, I thought to myself that she was making a very wise decision for the longer term of 15-20 years, but a significant error in the short term. Many of the Syrian immigrants seem to be reasonably well educated and definitely have initiative, in that they had the fortitude to emigrate. So they should be able to assimilate reasonably well. Here in the US, news media we hear a great deal about the problematical ones and the terrorists, but very little about the successes. But that is always the case.

        The same is true of the US. Most of the immigrants, even the uneducated ones from Mexico and Central America are assimilating reasonably well. In the case of the one that I mentioned from Burien, even though he was born of undocumented parents, he has worked hard, and progressed in the construction trades to the point he is a foreman and superintendent. While he does not make big dollars, he is certainly has a middle class income.

        As you stated it is sad that so many people are afraid.

      2. EJ

        As you point out, the New Germans tend to be excellent people: active, energetic, hardworking and not too proud to get their hands dirty, since if they weren’t they would not have made the journey. As you say, I look forward to seeing what they do decades from now. The most famous son of Syrian refugees was Steve Jobs, and while that’s a hard standard to live up to, it’s also an inspiring one.

        The opposition to immigration is puzzlingly dishonest. There’s a far-Right twitter bot which puts a flag in a map of Germany for every crime purportedly carried out by a New German (although they do not use that term, as the rest of us do.) Almost every news story that this bot links to is discredited: it lists a church burbing in Düsseldorf which was thought to be arson but later found to be an accident, it lists rapes which were committed by white Germans, and it lists many burglaries which were committed by suspects unknown. No rational person would take this map as authoritative, given its problems, and yet so many far-Right people do. They do not want to live in a world of facts. They want to live in a world where their prejudices are right, and facts conform to that. One cannot meaningfully debate with such people.

        My guess is that they’re scared. Global capitalism and the arrival of the New Germans has introduced many brilliant and hardworking people to our society. There is no longer a place for mediocrity, which terrifies those who are mediocre. For some, sabotaging our bright and hopeful future is the only way that they can imagine returning to a world mediocre enough to still have a place for them.

      3. EJ

        I don’t explain it. Poland is in the grip of nationalists intent on dismantling the institutions of the state, yes, but so is Hungary, so is Austria, so is Israel and so is America. Other countries like Britain, Norway and Italy are seeing their far-Right rise, and even France and Germany have seen them come within sight of electoral success. Japan and India are in the grip of nationalist governments which are veering further to the Right. Sadly, there’s nothing unusual about Poland right now.

        My theory is that resistance to such movements has to do with strong, established institutions with nonpartisan support: courts, newspapers, universites, established lobbying groups, academics, political norms of practise, and so on. In America these have been under attack by Trump and his supporters; in Britain they’re being attacked for being “insufficiently patriotic”, and I hear that the same is true for Italy. In France and Germany these institutions were the core of the resistance against the far-Right parties and were a major target of their scorn.

        Poland is a young country, as is Hungary. Both countries spent most of their 20th Century ruled by people who spoke either German or Russian. Sadly, they haven’t had time to develop institutions to the same degree, and so have less resistance available.

      4. EJ,
        I will not pretend to understand the phenomena – I use the plural because it varies from nation to nation. However, I have some ideas:
        1. As the Western economies have matured, they no longer have rapid population growth. Population growth is one of the biggest drivers of economic growth. Also due to the global Great Recession, economic growth slowed dramatically. The people are not seeing any improvement or significant improvement in their living conditions.
        2. People are seeing rapid change due to globalization and technical advances. Humanity did not develop to adjust to change as rapidly as it is occurring.
        3. Globalization gives many people the perception that they no longer have control over their lives. Rather outside forces over which the individual states have no control appear to be shaping their lives. That includes customs that have been stable for generations, but are now rapidly changing. This even includes language.
        4. This is a big one, but there has not been a major power war for over 70 years. Prior to this period the major powers had frequently been at war since the end of the Thirty Years War in 1648 and actually prior to that. People have largely forgotten the disruption that major war can cause, and they no longer feel the necessity of protection from a large nation state. It is much easier for each region to decide to be quasi-independent.
        5. The increasing migration of peoples across borders, is adding to the stress already occurring from these other forces.
        6. Global climate change is adding to the stress as well.

        These are just some of the factors, but the totality of these changes are causing a great deal of disgruntlement in the general public. People tend to feel if we could just go back to the “good, old days” then things would be great. Demagogues are always quick to seize upon disgruntlement and unrest to promote quick and simple solutions that will enable themselves to gain power and enrich themselves.

        The US is obviously the situation with which I am the most familiar. I believe Trump is a perfect example of a demagogue seizing the moment of great public dissatisfaction to promote himself. Consider his campaign rhetoric of “Making America Great Again”. All the policies he has promoted are simple, sound good and involve going back to the “good, old days.” Even the MAGA slogan itself is reactionary. That relieves people the necessity of adapting to a new reality. After all, the process of adaptation is hard, it requires the development and invention of new customs, to replace the old ones. Furthermore, we cannot forget that the Trump Companies are making a great deal of money and the Trumps are enriching themselves at this time.

        These are just some of the thoughts that I have. I am not a very deep thinker, so I am sure that I have just touched the surface. Hopefully, they may contribute to the discussion.

  8. Just a reminder that the tax legislation as proposed increases the national deficit.

    Deficit-increasing legislation, unless off set by legislative spending cuts or revenue increases, can automatically cut existing programs, like, say, oh…Medicare.

    “…this bill, along with a similar measure that the House passed on Thursday with lightning speed, would, because of a 2010 budget law, trigger automatic cuts to Medicare and other important programs that low-income and middle-class Americans depend on.”

    Why do elected Republican officials hate American citizens?

    I don’t have the vocabulary to express the disdain and anger I feel for those guys.

  9. Re new charges about Senator Al Franken forceably kissing a co-worker – McConnell says he wants to run this through the ethics committee, and that is fine, but he better run ALL of those in Congress who have been accused through the same process – from both parties! Note: McConnell has the legal capability right now to hold hearings on charges against Roy Moore, yet, have we heard anything about an ethics committee investigation on Moore? No. I have disdain for any man (or woman) who forces themselves on others, but I absolutely insist that the process be fair and consistent, not partisan.

    I will probably have to run a full scan on my computer after posting this, but, here goes (courtesy of one of my “conservative” friends on this topic).

    1. 538 has the most complete “what if” on the Moore controversy I’ve seen. He runs through all the scenarios….Take your pick. Oh, and Rush wants us all to know: “Moore was a Democrat at the time he allegedly engaged in sexual misconduct with teenage girls.”
      “Did you know that before 1992, when a lot of this was going on, that Judge Moore was a Democrat?” Limbaugh said on his radio show. “Nobody said a word.”

      From the sublime to the ridiculous! Politics in America. Meanwhile, the US House just passed a tax cut bill that will add $1.5T to the deficit, that was written in secret, had no hearings, and was rushed through without public comment….But, that’s just a distraction, right?

    2. More financial detail is coming out from Congress on money paid out to settle claims of sexual abuse and harassment of those who work in government service. Like so many issues today, when will the people draw a line and say “enough”! Whether it is gun violence, putrid behavior, destruction of our nation’s democratic institutions, abuse of legislative process, treatment of people of color – and abuse of those who work for a living for those who take advantage of their position or power.

      Note there is no breakdown by type of offense. That this cost center even exists is an indictment of the behavior of those in power. That it is so constant is yet another red flag. And, it crosses the aisle though there are some notable years of very large payments. What prompted those large claims?

  10. Let me just get it out there that I *hate* that I had to wake up this morning, turn on my news feed and see the news about Al Franken; not because he’s a Democrat, per se, but because every time I’ve seen him, I’ve been inclined to like the guy. With a great sense of humor and a likeable personality, he’s one of the few members of Congress I could honestly say I wouldn’t mind being around.

    Needless to say, it’s looking like 2018 is shaping to be one *helluva* year, but not for the reasons anyone expected.

    Regardless, it’s incumbent upon Democrats and their supporters (or potential supporters, most of all) to see that a just and honest process is taken, and if that calls for Sen. Franken’s resignation from office, then so be it. We cannot go into ’18 as a party that would condemn Roy Moore, rightly so, and yet turn a willful blind eye to one of our own when the time came.

    For those with Democratic representatives in the House or Senate (as I do), I hope you’ll call them and urge them to support the ongoing ethics investigation and, as the situation demands, to demand them to urge Sen Franken’s removal from office.

    1. Yes, the news regarding Al Franken was disturbing. But he did follow it up with a full and complete apology and asked for an investigation. He is being forthright and admitted a mistake. That I can accept. It is far better than Roy Moore’s actions or the typical action of many politicians who are caught in similar situations.

    2. As long as the process is “fair” and includes all MoC who have committed these actions, I’m all for it. My cynicism antenna is on high alert here, however. See link I posted earlier to Breitbart (ugh) and any number of other stories about congressional immunity for sexual harassment.

      1. Regarding McConnell getting involved, you are correct all MoC who have been accused should be going through a similar process. From the news reports I’ve read Franken himself called for an investigation. Other Democratic senators have also called for the investigation. However, no calls have been made on the R side for investigation of their own senators.

        However, this is typical of McConnell. Franken is an opportunity for him the turn-the-tables and he will seize it. As I’ve said before McConnell is totally a political animal. He does not care about doing the right thing for the nation. He only cares about maintaining the R majority and keeping the wealthy funders of the R Party happy. That of course also enriches himself by ensuring that the inside tips, campaign contributions, private funding, etc. keep flowing.

      2. McConnell’s a ‘political animal’ with severe limitations when the circumstances are right. As Majority Leader, his primary focus right now, above all else, is to see that Roy Moore is not allowed into the Senate. At. All. Costs.

        AT. ALL. COSTS.

        This isn’t like a bomb thrower like Cruz coming in. Have Moore serve as a member of the Republican conference is to align the party, rightly or wrongly, with endorsing pedophilia and child abuse. There is no f’ing coming back from that.

        McConnell’s best political move is to work to see that Jones is elected to serve out the rest of Sessions’ term and then win back the seat in ’20. At the moment, Republicans can’t pass a damn mailbox and they’re increasingly looking to be on the receiving end of a Democratic tsunami in ’18. As a conservative Democrat in an otherwise overwhelming Republican state, Republicans *should* be able to work with him if they’re willing to give a little. If their priority wasn’t trying to appease their donors with a tax bill that everyone else and their grandmother hates, they might’ve already figured that out.

        Meh, whatever. Let Republicans hang themselves politically for all I care. >>

      3. Ryan, you are correct for the long term and for the health of the R Party. But I respectfully disagree regarding Moore in the Senate. I believe that McConnell is more focused on maintaining the two seat Senate majority. That is necessary in the short term to get the tax cut for the wealthy through. He’d be happy to have Moore step aside, if there was assurance that Strange or another acceptable Republican would win. But the risks of Jones winning are too great. Also there does not seem to be anyone available for a write-in campaign, since Strange has said he is not interested. He wants to preserve his political future. That is the reason I’ve reluctantly come to the conclusion that I did as discussed in my comment of yesterday, below. Right now McConnell is only thinking of the
        short term. Besides McConnell might not be around to collect in 2021, if he loses the Majority Leadership he could retire comfortably. He is 75 and has to face reelection in 2020.
        That being said, sometime McConnell is going to miscalculate. That time might be now.

      4. >] Ryan, you are correct for the long term and for the health of the R Party. But I respectfully disagree regarding Moore in the Senate. I believe that McConnell is more focused on maintaining the two seat Senate majority. That is necessary in the short term to get the tax cut for the wealthy through.

        That would only hold true if it served some larger purpose, like avoiding an absolute wipeout in ’18. This “tax bill” doesn’t do that; it does exactly the opposite! It’s as if Democrats had written up a bill to play perfectly into their message and asked Republicans to please pass it. It screws over students, attacks healthcare, sunsets any actual middle-class tax relief in ten years to pay for a permanent tax cut. Hell, it even gives a tax break for private jets! (gee, who could *possibly* benefit from that, I wonder?)

        The only remotely logical explanation is that Republicans have essentially ceded that they’re going to get their asses handed to them in ’18 and that they *have* to pass this to appease their donors so as to avoid an absolute cataclysm, and yet the very vehicle for that is practically designed to piss people off even more.


      5. There’s one thing you are forgetting, Ryan. This tax cut plan doesn’t go into effect until 2019 – thus if the Repubs can spin their way past their base who either believe everything they are told or fail to do any independent research, they could pull past mid-terms with little damage. Unfortunately for the rest of us, great damage is being done daily to our democratic institutions and personal liberties. The only solution to that is to vote enough Republicans out of office so that we can get back to gridlock (haha) and then into a better bi-partisan checks and balance position.

        I am encouraged by the large number of Democratic candidates (especially the women) who are seeking office. Many for the first time – many who are young. In Texas, there are Democratic candidates popping up for many positions. We may lose the majority but we will win some. There is a group in TX that helps train and support female Democratic candidates (Annie’s List) and another that is working in several states, (EMERGE), which hails from CA. I know the young women who are organizing EMERGE and they are top notch, smart, young and very, very focused on flipping seats to female Democratic candidates.

        So, all is not doom and gloom – mostly just crappy politics. Let’s keep striving because, what else is there? Capitulation? Never!

      6. That is my point, the R’s do not care about governance or helping the American people. They are totally dependent on the contributions from the wealthy, keeping their base brainwashed, gerrymandering and voter suppression to maintain their power. They need to keep the contributions from the wealthy flowing to pay for the propaganda, so the brainwashing will not lose its effect. If the Tax Cut bill is not passed, then that will piss-off the big contributors big time. Their entire ponzi-scheme will then fall apart. That is the reason they are entirely focused on the next few weeks and 2-3 months. 2018 is the indefinite future.

  11. Reminder to everyone here:

    today is the day that the House votes on their tax bill. If you make less than $75,000, have student loans or are retired, own a house, live in a high tax state, or ever get sick, this bill is designed to have you personally pay more taxes to pay for the House GOP’s rich friends’ tax relief.

    Take five minutes to call your House Representative before 3pm EST today: that’s in three hours. So do it now. for quick access to phone numbers.

  12. I can’t believe I am defending Moore, the pig, or for that matter, many of the others, but here I am doing just that. Many of you have posted about changing norms in society, and I think we have to be well aware of that.

    One example jumps out at me on how societal norms have changed. Bogey and Bacall is considered by many as one of the great love stories. But that fact remains that when the two married, he was 44 and she 19. That was in 1945.

    Men pursuing women far younger has been considered “normal” for who knows how long. Another great movie of the 50’s, one of my favorites, have a much older Tom Ewell chasing an innocent 20ish Marilyn Monroe. Now, I know at the time he was late 40’s and Marilyn was actually 28, but no one considered her that age when you watched her in that movie. BTW, Ewell commits a sexual assault on her in that movie, and she brushes it off by saying “it happens to me all the time.”

    I believe that we have to look at Moore’s actions and view them through the lens that Frum’s tweets can provide. Given that Alabama is not much more progressive than say Afghanistan, India, or Pakistan when it comes to women’s rights, I say we can pity him, state that his views clearly disqualify from holding office in modern society, but we cannot vilify him for the culture he grew up in.

    And no, I am not talking about the assault on the 14 year old, though I am quite sure that 40 years ago in Alabamastan a 30 something man pursuing a 14 year old was not entirely uncommon.

    1. Moore has a reputation. Not only for his questionable actions as a judge (for which he was removed from the bench by his judicial peers not once but twice), but also he was known for loitering around malls and other areas where young girls were. In fact, it has been reported that he was explicitly told he could not hang out in certain areas due to complaints. Finally, the age difference is bothersome only because it puts a young, inexperienced girl in a situation with an older man that she may not be prepared to handle. But what really bothers me are the charges that he raped, fondled, made inappropriate gestures/ contact with these five women who were all young. Age difference aside, that’s the real problem for me. Here’s background you may not have read.

      1. Mary. I did know about the mall ban allegations. I tend to believe them, given everything else that has come to light. Like I said, the man is a pig, and very likely a predator. But that is part of the culture he grew up in.

        One cannot blame someone for where they were born, or what their parents, peers and schools imparted as a value system. However, one can point out how horrible that person’s value system is and give them an opportunity to experiences that will change that value system.

        Now, when that person refuses to improve (pretty every trump acolyte or moore supporter), then we can write them off, but we must always recognize where they started.

        Now, bringing it around to the puppet tyrant and his inner circle, they are utterly irredeemable, given their opportunities and experience with the rest of society outside of their origins, and the choices they continue to make.

      2. Would that people of color were accorded that same amount of tolerance for environment, Dins. I need to think more about that…I admit that I have much more understanding for a poor person who grew up in a difficult neighborhood than I do someone like Moore who obviously had access to law school and was lucky enough to be born white in AL. He would have been a distinct failure as a black man in AL.

    2. To throw in my two cents on this…

      Purely with respect to age difference, I find myself fairly open minded. I don’t think it’s *totally* out of the loop for someone who’s 18 or 19 to fall in love with someone who’s in their 30s. Would it be unusual? Yeah, and there would be obvious caveats and concerns that I’d want addressed, but I wouldn’t dismiss it out of hand.

      That said, that is *obviously* not what is going on with Roy Moore, not even remotely f’ing close.

      >] “I believe that we have to look at Moore’s actions and view them through the lens that Frum’s tweets can provide. Given that Alabama is not much more progressive than say Afghanistan, India, or Pakistan when it comes to women’s rights, I say we can pity him, state that his views clearly disqualify from holding office in modern society, but we cannot vilify him for the culture he grew up in.

      To say that we can’t vilify Roy Moore for lusting after little girls because of the culture he grew up in is like saying we can’t vilify a Klansman for lynching a black man in the South because of the culture he grew up in. The slippery slope here is obvious, and I don’t acknowledge nor credit it at all; in fact, I give it a wholehearted FUCK ‘DAT.

      Wrong is wrong, no matter the time nor the era, and the unspeakable harm dealt to these women, through no fault of their own, is all the reason in the world to vilify Roy Moore and to hold his hypocritical self-righteous ass to account. We do this because both the man and the culture itself are wrong, and to excuse one at the expense of the other is to grant it a measure of vindication, and that we must never do.

      1. I can speak from first hand experience on relationships with age difference. I met my husband when I was nineteen and he was thirty-one. We married fifteen months later. Our marriage lasted until his death, fifty-three years later. Therefore, I am certainly understanding that age differences are not barriers to healthy long relationships. But the difference between nineteen (and a rather mature young woman if I may state) and fourteen-sixteen years of age is immense in terms of real life experience. The manner of Moore’s meeting these young women is also highly suspect.

        I agree with Ryan on this. Wrong is wrong regardless where you are born. I give Moore no passes for his behavior because he has offered us a mirror to his soul in numerous ways, and it is not pure.

      2. Aaron: “Wrong is wrong, no matter the time nor the era”
        Mary: “Wrong is wrong regardless where you are born”

        It may be wrong. It may be evil. But if it is the culture you are born into, and you are insulated from any outside influences, you simply don’t know better.
        I am NOT saying moore falls under that umbrella. He has seen enough of the civilized world to know what is right and wrong.

        I just hope there is not some technically advanced vegetarian race out there, watching us, that finds eating other animals reprehensible, thinks “Wrong is wrong, no matter the time nor the era”, and decides to remove us from the equation.

      3. Oh, and another wonderful memory I can share is that upon our first introduction, my husband to be asked me how old I was….When I told him I was 19, he grimaced and said, “I don’t date teenagers”…then quickly asked: “When is your birthday?” Fortunately for me, it was in two weeks. The rest is history. He always was a stand-up kind of guy.

      4. Sorry Aaron, screwed up there on the reference.

        And yeah, I recognize my “ambiguity” on my outrage over the continued existence of the bannons et al when compared to my defense of someone’s culture as partially understanding the thought processes of all these men.

  13. EJ

    Seen on tumblr:

    2016: All your favourite show business celebrities are dying.

    2017: All your favourite show business celebrities have secretly been rapists this whole time.

    2018: I dunno, like The Wonder Dog was the Zodiac Killer or something.

    1. Good to see you’re still following, Fifty! I guess I measure progress a little differently than Sam Harris….Seems to me that people like Moore and, sadly, the people of AL who continue to re-elect people of questionable character to public office, are not holding the bar very high…I guess one could say that they are more at fault than the accused…but Moore is pretty low life.

  14. Chris – Call me totally cynical, but how will Republicans finesse the removal/resignation of Moore so as not to lose a Senate seat? Can the governor appoint a temporary replacement? Is it likely that a write in of Sessions could occur? Would they gamble that it is so impossible for a Dem to win in AL that they would risk Moore’s removal? Jones is an incredibly long shot but it seems that losing one senate seat would be equally risky.

    1. I will be interested to see what Chris’ thoughts are. Personnally, I think they are working this with a multi-pronged strategy.
      1. Initially the attempt was made to get the Governor to reschedule the election. There was major outcry, so for the moment that has been set aside.
      2. Currently there is a lot of pressure building to get Moore to step aside and then have a write-in. Possibly Strange or even Sessions would be selected. Sessions would have to resign as AG for that to happen. Right now Moore is not cooperating, but maybe they can throw enough inducements his way to get him to cooperate. But Bannon also is not cooperating and between Moore and him, the establishment Republican Party has a problem. Trump has not played his hand yet; he may have the “Trump” card.
      3. If that fails and Moore is elected, then they can refuse to seat him. But that will be really messy, would delay action on the Tax Bill and essentially kill any remaining hope of moving ahead on the agenda. I believe refusal to seat would take a 2/3 vote, but I’m not sure.
      4. They are scared stiff of allowing Moore to be seated, because that would be hung around the necks of every Republican senator. It would be like the Ancient Mariner with the Albatross. That would make loss of the Senate in 2018 almost a probability, rather than a possibility.
      5. McConnell is also terrified of allowing Jones to win. He’d only have a 1 seat majority. The Senate barely functions now, with a two seat majority. With a one seat majority, it would essentially cease to function.
      6. Regardless, McConnell is truly between a rock and and a hard place, with the pressure building.

      1. There is one other item, I failed to mention. McConnell could easily lose his Leadership over this fiasco. Currently, his approval rating with all Republicans is +30%; -41% for a net approval rating 0f -12%. This is the 2nd worst rating for any Congressional leader since 1981, and the worst for Republicans. See this FiveThirtyEight article:

        If there is anything the terrifies McConnell than anything else, it is loss of his Leadership position. For him, everything depends on that. I’not sure why, but that seems to be far more important than anything else.

      2. There is one more scenario – the AL Repub Party Leadership could make Moore withdraw with a plurality of votes from this council. There are seemingly lots of options but I don’t see Moore/Bannon pulling out of the race…they’ll go for the odds that he will take AL…but, I don’t know enough about how the Repub Party operates to know what is the surest choice given the circumstances and the candidate.

      3. This morning I just read in the Seattle Times (sourced from an article authored by Liam Stack of the NY Times) that the Alabama GOP has bylaws that would preclude Strange from seeking statewide office as a Republican for 6 years if he mounts a write-in campaign and loses following a primary loss. This would no doubt add another complication.

      4. 2) Moore has strong incentives to stay in the race. As long as he’s in it, he can still be the standardbearer for the nutcase Christian “conservatives”. Remember he and his wife make a living grifting off his foundation. Dropping out is an implicit admission of guilt, and if he does that he’s a pariah nobody will support or pay to come see. Even if Fox and the Republican party turn on him (and they seem to be) I think he’ll stay.

        3-5 Yeah, McConnell has problems with either as Senator. I think Moore probably won’t be seated if he wins, which could solve McConnell’s problem, but at this point it’s actually looking like he will lose. McConnell is racing to get the tax cut through, which might put the Republicans in a situation loosely analogous to the Democrats with the ACA, with the House looking at a bill it doesn’t want to pass but the Senate unable to change it or pass a House version because of a surprise thought-impossible loss. It’s a deeper hole for them because they are already on the reconciliation fallback, plus the tax cut will have much more serious flaws from the rush and the impossible goals.

      5. My thoughts continue to develop, partly based on Fair’s comments, especially 2, and Nate Silver’s comments in FiveThirtyEight:

        Given that the RNC appears to be discretely aiding Moore (thanks to Maddow), I am now beginning to think that their immediate strategy is to get Moore elected, while trying to diffuse the political fallout as much as possible. They realize there will be a effort to expel him after being seated, but with the 2/3 requirement and the fear that many senators have of the right wing, McConnell thinks he can beat that. That will at least maintain his 2 seat majority.

        McConnell has never done the right thing from the standpoint of governing the nation since he became Minority / Majority Leader. That has been especially true since Trump became a major factor. All actions have been calculated political actions to maintain his majority and keep the money flowing.

        Then when it comes to 2018, McConnell’s thought is that he will deal with that at the time. Given that most of the seats are in Trump territory and that there will be a lot of outside money, he can probably beat the Democratic push and maintain control of the Senate. Also the moral outrage at having seated a someone who is a probable abuser of underaged girls will have faded by that time. Afterall as some have pointed out historically older men chasing and marrying underage women is hardly new. Our morals and expectations as a society have evolved. Don’t forget Trump was elected despite the Access Hollywood Tapes. Afterall, “boys will be boys”.

        Do not get me wrong, I despise Moore, Brannon, Trump and that entire gang. That includes everything they stand for, but I am just trying to be realistic in my political expectations. The SWAMP IS NOT BEING DRAINED.

  15. The New Yorker with an in-depth exposition of the Sacklers: the family responsible for some of the biggest art museum and gallery establishments across the country, for which they care to place their family name prominently; and also the family responsible for OxyContin and its marketing and misinformation campaigning, traceable to hundreds of thousands of American deaths, for which they take care their family name is obfuscated and disengaged entirely.

    A useful thing to read, as I’m one of those ‘art is the necessary critic and self-reflection of society’ types, and here’s an example of how art can be placed in a vacuum away from the subject of its criticism.

    I’ve stood in many of the rooms full of art and history the Sacklers have enabled. And I’ve known a few people who have overdosed from opiates, one of whom died. And never considered the possibility that both experiences are curated from the same source.

  16. I think Frum has a point in that many people are starting to demand better. Also while I am still dismayed over how many people decided that Trump’s disgusting Access Hollywood tape didn’t cross any red lines for them, I like to think of that as one of the little pebbles that got this avalance started. We are lancing a putrid, festering boil on our society right now. The horrid and even downright blasphemous excuses some have offered in defense of Roy Moore indicate just how severe this infection is. The treatment isn’t going to be pleasant. But I’ll look at my own little bright spot- that the hypocrites are outing themselves spares me the time and effort in figuring out who they are. I’d love to see some angry women run against some of the jerk state reps, although Alabama is not Virginia.

  17. There is no question that social mores are changing, overall, generally for the better. But there are obviously holdouts, enclaves that will desperately cling to their old ways, no matter what the moral cost.

    These enclaves are the breeding ground for the potential terrorism to come. Because there is no doubt that if the bannon’s, mercer’s, murdoch’s and koch’s fail with their slow-moving coup, there will be blood in the streets perpetrated by the young white men from Alabamastan and the other fundamentalist regions in the U.S.

    I am not as well read as I should be, but I have never seen someone do a full-blown comparison of orthodox Judaism, fundamentalist Islam, and fundamentalist Christianity. As far as I can tell, the basic tenants that they have in common are far more numerous than the things that are different.

    All three groups most certainly hate women, as a starting point.

    1. EJ

      I’ve seen two full blown comparisons of fundamentalist forms of Abrahamic religions, one by pretty overt Nazis and one by New Atheists. Each had a fairly overt narrative that they were trying to push, and that overshadowed the religious scholarship to the point where I found little value in either.

      Thinking about it a little, I’m not even sure that one can make statements about “fundamentalist Christianity” or “fundamentalist Islam” as though the religion does not change in different times and places. The concerns of a modern American Protestant Christian fundamentalist are different from those of a modern African or Russian Christian fundamentalist, and different again from a medieval European Catholic. Tomorrow’s form of fundamentalism will no doubt be different again. The same is probably true of Islam and Judaism.

      Misogyny is probably going to be found in most of them, though, you’re right.

  18. Connect the dots. Today’s Houston Chronicle reports that in Texas: “Domestic violence cases have risen sharply across the state, with more than 210,000 wives, girlfriends, husbands and others suffering death or injury at the hands of a family member in the past two years. More than 550 wives or girlfriends were killed by a domestic partner between 2012 and 2016, according to state figures.”

    You think maybe there’s a link between male authoritarianism, harassment and domestic violence?

  19. I respect and read David Frum. I have a theory. I first got it watching my oldest daughter select and train dogs. And deciding if and when to breed them. She wanted intelligence, strength, protective of her and her family but also gentle to her and family. She wanted her animals to crave and love affection. To love being touched and petted. She got that by deciding who passed on their genes and who did not. This is how the dog was domesticated. Well guess what guys. The same process is going on with humans. The same qualities selected in dogs are what a woman would want in her mate . Women are in the process of domesticating the human species. By and large , over the long haul, if we (men) do not play ball we do not pass on our genes. Imperfect progress? Yes but if you look at history bit by bit humans are being domesticated.

    1. With all respect, there seems to be a certain presumption of ‘nature over nurture’ in what you say. We know that a parent’s abilities (intelligence, physical prowess, etc.) won’t necessarily be passed onto their children, so this idea of humans’ “domestication” rings more than a bit hollow. If anything, it sounds like a sociological twist on the conventional idea of evolution.

    1. Thanks – My concern, as is yours, is the unabated drift towards a major navigable waterway that empties into the Pacific and what that poison will do along the way to land and water tables not to mention marine life. To ignore something like this is simply unfathomable to me…The potential for great harm is staggering, yet, nothing. Is there any local effort from the two states through which the Columbia treks to petition the federal government for action before it is too late?

      1. As I mentioned initially, the State of Washington goes to court on a regular basis whenever required to hold the Federal Government’s feet to the fire. I’m obviously not familiar with all the details, but there are contractual agreements and court orders in place. Oregon is also involved in this.

        Washington has had a succession of very good AG’s. Christine Gregoire was one who was heavily involved in the Tobacco Settlement. She became a two-term governor. Ferguson is our current AG and he has been heavily involved in the litigation against Trump. I’ve mentioned him previously. He is likely to become our next governor in 2021. As I’ve mentioned previously, the D AG’s are closely cooperating. That is particularly true on the West Coast. The cooperation will increase now that the WA Senate is in D hands.

      2. Speaking of the rest of America, I hesitate to place any kind of faith in these latest Alabama polls (’cause, y’know… it’s still f’ing Alabama), but if by some unbelievable turnaround, Jones actually did eke out a win, that would be a political earthquake. Democrats’ otherwise thin-as-a-thimble chance of retaking the Senate in ’18 wouldn’t be such a pipe dream anymore. Assuming their red-state senators could hold on (a very tall order, tbs, but not unthinkable in a blue tsunami), they’d only need two seats to flip the chamber (looking at you, Arizona & Nevada).

      3. You can bet Republicans are keenly aware of what a loss in AL would mean to mid-terms. Doug Jones is such a fine person that I am not going to write his chances off….in fact, I sent his campaign a donation to help him combat the enormous influx of PAC cash coming into the state. Should Moore win, which is more probable than a Jones upset, he will further roil the GOP ability to work cohesively. As Bannon’s candidate, Moore is not going to help McConnell, furthering Bannon’s announced commitment to knock McConnell from Senate leadership.

        I suspect there will be other races like this and I also believe that Bannon will utilize every retirement and weak GOP seat to advance his agenda.

      4. We are in unchartered territory. Moore is just “off” enough to hang on, especially given the home support he’s receiving. Lordy – his constituents deserve him but America doesn’t!

        It’s kind of karma that in the midst of trying to pass a stealth tax cut plan, the GOP is having to deal with this….Of course, knowing their twisted mindset, they may relish the diversion…Things are so upside down who knows anymore?

      5. >] “To misquote Chris, if the Republicans lose Alabama then that’s an extinction-level event, surely?

        Put it this way: Republicans are so desperate to keep Moore out of the Senate that they’re de-facto endorsing a Democrat by encouraging Luther Strange to opt for a write-in campaign (as close to a surefire strategy as you’re going to get to blow it for the GOP in Alabama). Trump’s shadow is looming large enough over Republicans, and having to spend all over ’18 having to answer for Moore on top of that is a political nightmare the likes of which I can’t think of any contemporary comparison for in modern history.

        This is why they’re going to the unprecedented lengths of actually lobbying Gov. Ivey to try and delay the election so they can figure something out. True enough, that has serious consequences on its own, but they’re in a catch-22 otherwise, so desperate times call for desperate measures.

        I don’t know if I’d call this an extinction-level event, but with the GOP facing a suburban revolt (likely all across the country), if they can’t find a way out of this, the consequences are far-reaching and immense.

      6. Rachel Maddow’s show tonight discounted any genuine effort by the RNC to disengage from the Moore campaign…They have 11 RNC operatives on the ground in AL as we speak. I guess this could be a slick move by the RNC to “appear” as though they are appalled at the actions by Moore, while in actuality, they are still helping him. Jones will need a miracle to win…50 AL pastors have come out in support of Moore…that state is one sick place to live…kind of makes Texas look progressive in comparison, and coming from this blue girl, that’s saying a lot!

      7. Looks like McConnell’s seriously considering going for the nuclear option should Moore win; kicking a newly minuted Senator out of the Senate.

        Purely from a political standpoint, you want to ignite a Republican Civil War? Do this. You’ll be like Santa to Steve Bannon, and he’ll be sporting a grin a mile wide, and you can take that to the bank.

        McConnell’s insane if he does this. The move here is to quietly support Jones, endure a Democrat in the seat for 3 years and then win it back by more than 20 pts in ’20, not ignite a frothing rage in your base that could have Bannon dealing you three or four Moores in Republican primaries.

  20. I liked the tweet thread but I disagree with this one: “The revelations are occurring -and have power- not because of a decline in behavior but a rise in ethical standards.”

    Quite simply, I think the rise is not in higher ethical standards but in the strength of the women’s movement. I have been commenting on that for a while now and it is being affirmed in election results (turnout) and by what I am seeing on the ground. Women are marrying later, are more comfortable having protected sex outside a marriage, and are tolerant of others of different sexual orientations and preferences. They are joined by the huge, maturing “Millennial” generation which has a laissez-faire attitude toward individual choice. Women have drawn a line in the sand and change is happening. And, it is time.

    I have seen woman power at work, building and expressing itself. Look at who is powering these grassroots organizations across America…look at the women who have stepped up to run for office. Maybe it’s where I am but I suspect it is more broad-based than my own small sphere of influence.

    I don’t believe it has anything to do with a rise in ethical standards; rather, it has everything to do with women saying “enough”! Demanding that they not be hit upon, taken for granted, and perceived as sex objects. Male behavior may improving but only because it is being demanded by women and because they are being called out for their crass, inappropriate and sometimes dangerous demands. I acknowledge that this is not how all men treat women, just far too many in positions of authority. The rest of you guys – thank you for your respectful treatment of women. Your moms, wives, daughters, sisters, and colleagues thank you as well. The others – may your names be splashed all over the news and may you be held accountable – finally! It ain’t ethics; it’s consequences.

    1. Not just women – there is an overall tendency for the weak to get stronger

      BUT there is also a different tendency – the other way – for some of the powerful to get more powerful and MORE able to ignore the consequences

      We are outing and clobbering show business types – but CEO’s and business leaders not to mention politicians are still getting away with it

      1. Yes. That’s what gave rise to the petition from over twelve hundred former Congressional pages and I think is starting to be an issue in business. It may have started in the corporate sector with the equal pay for equal work, plus job opportunities for qualified women in sectors that are dominated by male hires, but my hope is that more women will be emboldened and will not only stand up for themselves if accosted, but will draw that line early in their employment.

        Undoubtedly, there are women who use sex as a means for advancement and they sully the majority who qualify on their own merits. But, bottom line, no woman should feel they have to put up with this behavior and men who foist themselves upon women need to be held accountable – legally and financially.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.